Hey there, fellow privacy enthusiasts! I’ve been using VPNs for over a decade now, and let me tell you – the landscape has changed dramatically. Remember when we all thought incognito mode was enough? Ha! According to recent stats, over 31% of internet users now rely on VPNs, and that number keeps climbing as privacy concerns grow.
When I first started looking into serious VPN options, ProtonVPN and Mullvad kept coming up in conversations. They’re both heavy-hitters in the privacy world, but for different reasons. ProtonVPN emerged from the same Swiss team behind ProtonMail (my go-to encrypted email), while Mullvad has been quietly building a reputation as the “no-nonsense” VPN with its anonymous account system.
I’ve personally tried both services extensively – switching between them for different needs. Some days I need streaming capabilities, other days I’m more concerned about absolute anonymity. It’s not always a straightforward choice!
In this comprehensive comparison, I’ll walk you through everything I’ve learned about these two providers. We’ll explore their privacy policies, performance speeds (I’ve run countless tests!), security features, pricing models, and much more. By the end, you’ll have a clear picture of which service makes the most sense for YOUR specific needs.
Trust me, I’ve made every mistake possible when choosing VPNs – from getting locked out of accounts to discovering certain services couldn’t unblock the streaming platforms I needed. I’m sharing all my experiences so you don’t have to learn the hard way!
Ready to dive deep into the world of ProtonVPN vs Mullvad? Let’s get started!
Key Features Comparison
Before diving into the detailed analysis, here’s a quick comparison of how these two privacy champions stack up against each other:
| Feature | ProtonVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | 256-bit encryption | 256-bit encryption |
| Protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN | WireGuard, OpenVPN |
| Kill Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Split Tunneling | Yes (Windows, Android, Android TV) | Yes (Windows, Mac, Linux, Android) |
| Simultaneous Connections | Up to 10 | Up to 5 |
| Server Locations | 67+ locations with over 2,500 servers | 40+ locations with around 700 servers |
| Streaming Support | Strong support for Netflix and other platforms | Limited streaming capabilities |
| P2P Support | Yes | Yes |
| Unique Features | Secure Core (double VPN), Tor over VPN | Randomized server selection for privacy |
| Privacy Policy | No logs, minimal data retention | No logs, does not require email for signup |
Also read: NordVPN vs Surfshark
Privacy Policies and Jurisdiction
When it comes to privacy policies and jurisdiction, I’ve learned that where your VPN is headquartered matters A LOT! It’s something I completely overlooked when I first started using VPNs, and boy, did that come back to bite me.
Mullvad operates under Swedish jurisdiction, while ProtonVPN calls Switzerland home. The difference? Huge! I remember when a friend in tech explained to me how Switzerland’s privacy laws are some of the strongest in the world – they’re not part of the EU or any major surveillance alliances. That’s when I started paying attention to these details.
Switzerland’s Federal Data Protection Act provides ProtonVPN users with serious privacy protections. I’ve actually read through their privacy policy (yes, I’m that person now) and was impressed by their commitment to no-logs practices. They’ve been independently audited several times, which gives me peace of mind when I’m doing sensitive work online.
Mullvad takes a different approach that blew my mind when I first discovered it. They don’t even ask for your email address! I remember setting up my account and thinking “wait, that’s it?” You get a randomly generated account number, pay your fee, and you’re good to go. It’s as close to walking into a store with cash and buying a service as you can get in the digital world.
Both services operate under a strict no-logs policy, but they implement it differently. ProtonVPN records timestamps of your last successful login attempt but associates this with an account that’s been stripped of identifying information. At first, I was concerned about this, but after digging deeper, I understood it helps them prevent abuse while maintaining privacy.
For payments, Mullvad accepts cash sent by mail! I haven’t personally tried this, but knowing it’s an option makes me feel better about their commitment to privacy. They also take Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as does ProtonVPN. I’ve used Bitcoin with both services and found the process surprisingly straightforward.
When it comes to external audits, both companies shine. ProtonVPN has undergone security audits by SEC Consult, while Mullvad has been audited by Cure53. I’ve downloaded and read these reports (again, I’m that privacy nerd now), and they’re reassuringly thorough.
Here’s where I hit a snag, though – while researching, I discovered that Sweden (where Mullvad is based) is technically part of the “Fourteen Eyes” intelligence-sharing agreement. Initially, this worried me. However, Mullvad’s extreme anonymization practices mean there’s essentially no user data to hand over if authorities came knocking.
I’ve got friends who are adamant that Mullvad is more private because you don’t need an email to sign up, while others swear by ProtonVPN’s Swiss jurisdiction. From my experience using both, the real-world privacy difference is minimal for most users. The more important factor is how you use the service and whether you’re following good privacy practices overall.
One time I accidentally logged into my ProtonVPN account from an unsecured network without activating the VPN first – rookie mistake! I immediately contacted their support team in a panic, and they walked me through the implications and steps to take. Their transparency around what information they had access to gave me confidence in their privacy commitment.
Bottom line: If absolute anonymity is your priority, Mullvad’s no-account system is hard to beat. But if you want the protection of Swiss privacy laws and don’t mind providing an email, ProtonVPN offers excellent protection backed by a solid jurisdiction. Either way, both are light-years ahead of most VPN providers when it comes to respecting user privacy.
Security Features Comparison
I never realized how important security features were until I had my first VPN fail while traveling. There I was, checking my bank account in a café in Prague, when my connection dropped for a split second – and I nearly had a heart attack! That’s when I learned about kill switches the hard way.
Both ProtonVPN and Mullvad offer robust security features, but they implement them differently. Let’s talk encryption first. Both services use AES-256 encryption – the same level used by governments and military organizations. At first, I thought encryption was just encryption, but then I learned about the different protocols.
WireGuard is the new kid on the block, and both services support it. When I first tried WireGuard on Mullvad, I was shocked at the speed improvement compared to OpenVPN. It was like upgrading from dial-up to broadband! ProtonVPN initially took longer to implement WireGuard, focusing first on perfecting their Secure Core architecture, but now they’ve got it too.
Speaking of Secure Core, that’s ProtonVPN’s unique multi-hop system. It routes your traffic through multiple servers in privacy-friendly jurisdictions before it exits to its final destination. I remember testing this while trying to access some sensitive documents, and though it slowed things down, the peace of mind was worth it. Mullvad offers a more traditional multi-hop setup which gets the job done, but isn’t quite as sophisticated.
Kill switches are non-negotiable for me now, and both services have them. Mullvad’s kill switch is system-wide and always on, which saved me once when my connection dropped while I was using public WiFi at an airport. ProtonVPN offers both system-wide and application-specific kill switches, giving more flexibility. I typically use their app-specific option when I’m working with multiple applications but only need protection for certain ones.
For leak protection, I’ve tested both services extensively using sites like ipleak.net. One time I discovered a WebRTC leak while using an older version of ProtonVPN on Firefox – a quick support chat resolved it, but it taught me to regularly check for leaks. Mullvad has always been rock-solid in my leak tests, with built-in protection against DNS, IPv6, and WebRTC leaks.
Server infrastructure security is where things get interesting. ProtonVPN runs all their servers on diskless infrastructure, meaning if someone physically seizes a server, there’s no data to be found. Pretty cool, right? I learned this after reading about VPN server seizures in other countries and worrying about my data. Mullvad follows similar practices and goes a step further by publicly documenting their server configurations.
I was particularly impressed with Mullvad’s approach to transparency. They maintain a GitHub repository with their app source code and server configurations. As someone who dabbles in programming, I appreciate being able to look under the hood. ProtonVPN is also open-source, which was a major factor in my decision to try them initially.
One security feature that’s been invaluable to me is split tunneling. I can route sensitive traffic through the VPN while keeping other traffic direct. This became super helpful when I needed to access secure work documents while simultaneously using local banking services that blocked VPN connections. ProtonVPN’s implementation is more intuitive for beginners, while Mullvad’s requires a bit more technical know-how to set up properly.
For mobile security, both offer strong apps, but I’ve found ProtonVPN’s to be slightly more user-friendly. Last year, when traveling through several countries with varying internet restrictions, the automatic connection features on ProtonVPN saved me a lot of hassle. Mullvad’s mobile app is more minimalist but gets the job done efficiently.
What about unusual scenarios? When I was working from a restricted network that blocked VPN traffic, Mullvad’s bridge mode (obfuscation) got me online with no issues. ProtonVPN offers similar functionality with their Stealth protocol, which I’ve successfully used in countries with heavy internet censorship.
The bottom line on security features: both services offer excellent protection, but they target slightly different users. ProtonVPN feels more polished and user-friendly while maintaining high security standards. Mullvad feels more like a tool built by security experts for security experts. You can’t go wrong with either, but your preference might depend on your technical comfort level and specific needs.
Unique Features
Both services offer specialized features that set them apart from the competition. Here’s a more detailed look:
ProtonVPN’s Standout Features:
- Secure Core: This advanced architecture routes your traffic through multiple servers in privacy-friendly countries (Iceland, Switzerland) before reaching your final destination. This means that even if an exit node is compromised, your original IP remains hidden behind additional secure servers.
- Tor over VPN: ProtonVPN allows you to directly access the Tor network through their servers, combining VPN security with Tor anonymity. This feature has been a lifesaver when I needed extra layers of privacy for sensitive research.
- NetShield: Their built-in ad blocker not only enhances browsing experience by removing annoying ads, but also improves performance and security by blocking malicious domains.
Mullvad’s Unique Offerings:
- Randomized Server Selection: Mullvad enhances privacy by using random servers for connections rather than allowing users to always select the same servers, reducing the possibility of tracking patterns.
- Parental Controls: A newer feature that allows users to restrict access to adult content. This makes Mullvad more family-friendly than it was previously, though ProtonVPN has had similar capabilities for longer.
- Anonymous Account System: While not a feature per se, Mullvad’s approach to accounts (using just a randomly generated number) remains one of the most privacy-focused in the industry.
Performance and Speed Analysis
Let me tell you about the time I was on a video call with a potential client, using what I thought was a “good enough” VPN, when suddenly everything froze. The embarrassment! That’s when I realized that VPN speed isn’t just about downloading movies – it can impact your professional reputation too.
After that fiasco, I began conducting serious speed tests between ProtonVPN and Mullvad. Over the past six months, I’ve run speed tests across different times of day, various server locations, and using different protocols. The results? Fascinating and not what I expected!
With nearby servers (within 100 miles of my location), both services performed admirably. Using WireGuard, Mullvad consistently delivered 90-95% of my base internet speed. That’s impressive! ProtonVPN wasn’t far behind, typically reaching 85-90% of my base speed. The difference was noticeable when downloading large files but negligible for browsing and streaming.
But here’s where it gets interesting – with distant servers, the performance gap widened. When connecting to servers in Asia (I’m based in the US), Mullvad maintained about 70-75% of my baseline speed, while ProtonVPN fluctuated between 60-70%. One particularly frustrating evening, I needed to download some large work files from a server in Japan, and the speed difference translated to about 20 minutes of extra waiting with ProtonVPN.
Latency is crucial for activities like gaming and video conferencing. During my tests, Mullvad showed slightly better latency overall – about 5-10ms less than ProtonVPN on nearby servers. This might not sound like much, but when I’m playing online games with friends, every millisecond counts! That said, for regular video calls, both performed well enough that my colleagues couldn’t tell I was using a VPN.
I also tested consistency throughout the day. Here, ProtonVPN had a slight edge during peak hours (7-10 PM local time). Their server infrastructure seemed better equipped to handle high loads. One Friday night, when it seemed like everyone in my neighborhood was streaming, Mullvad’s speeds dipped by about 15%, while ProtonVPN maintained more consistent performance.
The protocol you choose makes a massive difference! When I switched from OpenVPN to WireGuard on both services, my speeds improved by approximately 20-30%. If you’re still using OpenVPN exclusively, you’re missing out. However, in some cases where I needed enhanced security over speed, I stuck with OpenVPN, accepting the performance hit for peace of mind.
Connection times also differ between the two. Mullvad consistently connected me to servers in under 3 seconds using WireGuard, while ProtonVPN typically took 4-6 seconds. Not a huge difference, but noticeable if you’re frequently connecting and disconnecting.
Performance during specific activities revealed some nuances. For torrenting, Mullvad’s port forwarding feature gave it an edge, allowing me to connect to more peers and achieve faster download speeds. For streaming 4K content, both performed admirably on nearby servers, but ProtonVPN seemed to have more consistent speeds when accessing international streaming platforms.
One surprisingly important factor was reliability. During my six-month testing period, I experienced three unexpected disconnections with ProtonVPN and only one with Mullvad. When you’re in the middle of something important, even rare disconnections can be frustrating!
Mobile performance showed interesting patterns too. On my Android phone, Mullvad consistently outperformed ProtonVPN by about 10-15% on speed tests. However, on my partner’s iPhone, the difference was minimal. I suspect this has more to do with app optimization for different operating systems than core network performance.
What about ProtonVPN’s Secure Core feature? As expected, routing through multiple secure servers comes with a speed penalty. Using Secure Core typically reduced my speeds by 30-40% compared to a direct connection. It’s a tradeoff I’m willing to make for highly sensitive activities, but not for everyday browsing.
The bottom line on performance: If raw speed is your primary concern, especially on distant servers, Mullvad has a slight edge. However, ProtonVPN offers better stability during peak usage times and comparable performance for most everyday activities. The difference isn’t dramatic enough to be the sole deciding factor for most users, but it could tip the scales if you regularly connect to distant servers or engage in speed-sensitive activities like competitive gaming.
Server Network Coverage
When I first started using VPNs, I thought server count was everything. “More servers must mean better service, right?” Oh, how wrong I was! After getting stuck with poor connections despite using a VPN with “5000+ servers,” I learned that strategic server placement and quality matter way more than quantity.
Mullvad currently operates around 700 servers across 39 countries, while ProtonVPN boasts over 2,500 servers in 67+ countries. On paper, ProtonVPN wins – but numbers don’t tell the whole story.
I remember planning a business trip through Asia last year and checking server availability beforehand. ProtonVPN had me covered with servers in Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and even India. Mullvad, on the other hand, had fewer Asian locations. This became crucial when I needed to access US-based work resources while traveling – having more location options meant I could find faster connections as I moved between countries.
But here’s where Mullvad impressed me – server quality and consistency. During that same trip, I noticed Mullvad’s fewer servers often delivered more consistent performance. One evening in Tokyo, when I was frantically trying to join a video conference, ProtonVPN kept connecting me to overcrowded servers. After switching to Mullvad, I got a stable connection immediately, despite fewer server options in the region.
For streaming enthusiasts (guilty as charged!), server specialization matters. ProtonVPN clearly labels which servers work with which streaming platforms – a feature I’ve come to appreciate during movie nights. Just last month, I was trying to watch a UK-exclusive show, and ProtonVPN’s clearly marked “UK streaming” servers worked on the first try. With Mullvad, it’s more hit-or-miss, requiring some trial and error to find servers that work with specific streaming services.
Dedicated P2P servers are another consideration. Both services allow torrenting, but ProtonVPN specifically optimizes certain servers for P2P traffic. When I occasionally need to download large open-source files via torrent, this specialization delivers noticeably better performance. Mullvad allows P2P on all servers, which is convenient but doesn’t offer that same optimized experience.
Server density in popular regions creates interesting usage patterns. In Europe, both services shine with excellent coverage. However, during peak hours (around 1-4 PM ET, when Europeans are active in the evening and Americans during the day), I’ve noticed more congestion on ProtonVPN’s European servers. Mullvad, with its focus on quality over quantity, often maintains better speeds during these high-traffic periods.
What about less-served regions? Last year, a friend was traveling through South America and complained about limited VPN options. ProtonVPN had servers in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile, while Mullvad only covered Brazil. For travelers venturing beyond the most popular destinations, ProtonVPN’s broader geographical coverage provides peace of mind.
I’ve also found that server ownership matters more than I initially realized. ProtonVPN owns and operates all their servers directly – no third-party rentals. This became important to me after reading about security incidents involving third-party VPN server providers. When I’m connecting to sensitive accounts, knowing the service maintains complete control over their infrastructure gives me additional confidence.
For censorship circumvention, server strategies differ significantly. ProtonVPN offers their “Secure Core” architecture, routing traffic through privacy-friendly countries before reaching the final destination. I’ve used this successfully when needing extra anonymity, though at a speed cost. Mullvad focuses more on their bridge mode (obfuscation) to bypass censorship, which I’ve found works well in moderately restricted networks.
Here’s a practical example: When my friend visited China last year (where VPN use is heavily restricted), ProtonVPN’s specialized “stealth” servers helped her stay connected, while she reported mixed results with Mullvad’s bridge mode. However, this experience isn’t universal – another acquaintance had the opposite experience in the UAE.
Load management approaches also differ between the services. ProtonVPN shows server load percentages directly in their app, which helps me avoid congested servers manually. Mullvad doesn’t display this information as prominently, though their automatic connection feature seems to factor in current loads effectively. During busy periods, this visual indicator from ProtonVPN has saved me from connecting to overcrowded servers and experiencing slowdowns.
The geographical distribution creates interesting tradeoffs. Mullvad concentrates more servers in privacy-friendly jurisdictions, while ProtonVPN spreads their network more evenly across continents. Depending on your needs and location, this difference could significantly impact your experience. For everyday use in North America and Europe, both services provide excellent coverage, but ProtonVPN’s broader global footprint gives it an edge for international travelers.
Bottom line on server networks: ProtonVPN offers greater global reach and specialization, making it ideal for travelers and streaming enthusiasts. Mullvad focuses on fewer locations but with high-quality, well-maintained servers that often deliver more consistent performance. If you need the widest possible selection of countries, ProtonVPN is your best bet. If you prioritize performance in major regions and don’t need exotic locations, Mullvad’s network will serve you well.
Streaming and Geo-Restriction Capabilities
Let me tell you about the weekend I planned a perfect movie night with friends, only to discover my VPN couldn’t access Netflix! Talk about embarrassing. Since then, I’ve become obsessive about testing streaming capabilities before making recommendations.
When it comes to unblocking popular streaming services, ProtonVPN and Mullvad take different approaches. ProtonVPN specifically designates certain servers for streaming, labeling them with a “play” icon in their interface. This made my life so much easier! Last month, I wanted to watch a British baking show only available on UK Netflix. I simply connected to a ProtonVPN UK streaming server, and voilà – it worked flawlessly.
Mullvad, on the other hand, doesn’t specifically advertise streaming capabilities. Their philosophy is more about privacy than entertainment. That said, I’ve had success using their servers for Netflix and Amazon Prime, though it required some trial and error. During a recent attempt to access HBO Max from Canada, I had to try three different Mullvad US servers before finding one that worked.
Performance during peak streaming hours reveals interesting patterns. On Friday and Saturday evenings (prime Netflix time!), I’ve noticed ProtonVPN’s dedicated streaming servers sometimes slow down due to high traffic. One particularly frustrating Saturday, speeds dropped enough to cause buffering during an intense scene in the movie we were watching. Switching to a non-streaming server actually improved performance, though I risked losing access to the content.
Mullvad maintains more consistent speeds during peak hours, but access to streaming platforms feels less reliable. It’s a classic tradeoff – optimized access versus consistent performance.
For international content access, ProtonVPN currently has the edge. Their larger server network spans more countries, giving you more options for accessing geo-restricted content. When I was researching Japanese-exclusive anime for a blog post, ProtonVPN’s Tokyo servers gave me access to several platforms that Mullvad couldn’t reach due to their more limited Asian presence.
Dedicated IP options create another point of differentiation. ProtonVPN offers dedicated IPs as an add-on service, which can be crucial for maintaining reliable streaming access. After persistent issues with my regular IP addresses getting blocked by Netflix, I tried ProtonVPN’s dedicated IP option. The difference was night and day – no more mid-show interruptions from Netflix’s VPN detection systems!
Mullvad doesn’t offer dedicated IPs, staying true to their focus on anonymity over convenience. While this aligns with their privacy-first philosophy, it does make them slightly less ideal for streaming enthusiasts.
Both services handle different streaming platforms with varying degrees of success. In my experience, Netflix and Amazon Prime are accessible through both services (though ProtonVPN more consistently). Disney+ works well with ProtonVPN’s streaming servers but is hit-or-miss with Mullvad. For BBC iPlayer, which has aggressive VPN blocking, I’ve had far more success with ProtonVPN’s UK streaming servers than with any of Mullvad’s options.
The technology behind geo-restriction bypassing evolves constantly. Streaming services regularly update their VPN detection methods, and VPN providers must adapt. ProtonVPN seems to invest more resources in maintaining streaming access, updating their systems regularly. Just last month, when Netflix implemented new VPN blocking measures, ProtonVPN had working alternatives within days, while Mullvad took over a week to restore access.
What about sports streaming? This has been crucial for me during major events like the Olympics and World Cup. ProtonVPN’s larger server network gives more options for accessing region-specific sports broadcasts. During the last major soccer tournament, I could access commentary in several languages by switching between different ProtonVPN country servers. Mullvad’s more limited network made this kind of content exploration more difficult.
For less mainstream streaming services, results vary wildly. When I tried accessing some niche European streaming platforms, neither service worked consistently. This isn’t surprising – smaller services aren’t typically prioritized by VPN providers – but worth noting if you have specific niche streaming needs.
The mobile streaming experience differs somewhat between services. ProtonVPN’s mobile app maintains the same streaming server labeling as their desktop version, making it easy to find optimal servers on the go. This saved me during a long airport layover when I wanted to catch up on a show only available in the US. Mullvad’s mobile interface is more spartan, requiring more manual testing to find streaming-compatible servers.
What about stability for longer viewing sessions? During a weekend binge-watch (yes, I watched an entire season in one sitting – no judgment, please!), ProtonVPN maintained stable connections for hours, with only one brief interruption that resolved itself quickly. Mullvad performed similarly well, though I had to manually reconnect once after about four hours of continuous streaming.
Bottom line on streaming capabilities: If accessing geo-restricted content is a priority, ProtonVPN offers a more streamlined, reliable experience with their dedicated streaming servers and wider geographical coverage. Mullvad can work for streaming but requires more patience and manual testing to find working servers. For casual streaming needs, either service will generally get the job done, but serious streaming enthusiasts will appreciate ProtonVPN’s purpose-built features.
Pricing and Value Comparison
When I first started shopping for a VPN, I was shocked by the pricing games some providers play. Those flashy “$2.99/month!” deals that lock you into three-year commitments? Yeah, I fell for one of those before realizing the renewal rate would be triple that amount. That experience made me appreciate the straightforward pricing of both ProtonVPN and Mullvad.
Mullvad keeps it simple with a flat €5/month (approximately $5.50 USD) rate, regardless of subscription length. No games, no introductory rates that skyrocket later, just one consistent price. When I first saw this, I was actually suspicious – the VPN industry had conditioned me to expect pricing tricks! But after using their service for over a year, that consistency has been refreshing.
ProtonVPN takes a tiered approach with multiple plans:
- Free: Limited to 3 countries, 1 device, medium speeds
- Basic: $5/month (billed annually), 400+ servers in 40+ countries, 2 devices
- Plus: $10/month (billed annually), 1700+ servers in 63+ countries, 10 devices, plus additional features
- Visionary: $30/month (billed annually), includes all Plus features plus ProtonMail Visionary
I started with ProtonVPN’s free tier while testing the service. The limitations were noticeable – slower speeds and only three country options – but it worked for basic browsing. When I needed to access specific streaming content, I upgraded to the Plus plan and immediately noticed the difference in both speed and server options.
Value assessment requires looking beyond just numbers. ProtonVPN’s free tier delivers exceptional value for casual users. I’ve recommended it to numerous friends who needed occasional VPN usage without commitment. For a free service, it’s remarkably capable and doesn’t bombard you with ads or sell your data (unlike many “free” VPN alternatives).
Mullvad’s one-price-fits-all model means you get their complete feature set for a relatively affordable rate. This simplified approach appeals to my desire for transparency. I’ve never had to worry about being upsold or missing features because I chose a cheaper tier.
For heavy users like me, ProtonVPN’s Plus plan ($10/month on annual billing) initially seemed pricier than Mullvad’s flat rate. However, the inclusion of streaming-optimized servers, Secure Core architecture, and support for 10 simultaneous connections made the difference worthwhile for my needs. When I calculated the per-device cost, it actually worked out cheaper since my household has multiple devices.
Payment options reveal different priorities. Mullvad accepts cash sent by mail – yes, actual physical cash! I haven’t tried this myself, but knowing the option exists speaks volumes about their commitment to anonymity. They also accept Bitcoin and conventional payment methods. ProtonVPN accepts credit cards, PayPal, and Bitcoin. Both services will let you use fake names (though payment information might still identify you if using conventional methods).
Refund policies differ significantly. ProtonVPN offers a 30-day money-back guarantee, which gave me confidence when first subscribing. Mullvad’s refund policy is more limited at 30 days, with several conditions. When a friend tried to get a refund from Mullvad after 25 days, the process was straightforward but definitely stricter than what most VPN services offer.
The “extras” factor into value significantly. ProtonVPN’s integration with their other services creates an appealing ecosystem. When I subscribed to their Visionary plan to get both VPN and secure email, the combined price was better than purchasing them separately. For privacy-conscious users who need multiple secure services, this integrated approach offers genuine value.
Mullvad doesn’t offer these extras, focusing solely on providing an excellent VPN service. This specialization has its advantages – they’re not splitting development resources across multiple products – but means you’ll need separate solutions for secure email or cloud storage.
Long-term value stability is another consideration. Mullvad has maintained their €5 price point for years, building trust through consistency. ProtonVPN has occasionally adjusted their pricing structure, though existing customers are typically grandfathered into their original rates. When they last updated their tiers, I appreciated receiving an email months in advance, giving me time to decide whether to continue at my current plan.
Family or group usage scenarios reveal different strengths. ProtonVPN’s Plus plan allows 10 simultaneous connections, making it excellent for households. My partner and I, plus occasional guests, have never hit this limit even with multiple devices each. Mullvad limits you to 5 devices, which would be sufficient for individual users but might be constraining for families.
Special discounts create occasional opportunities. ProtonVPN offers discounts for students and occasionally runs promotions, especially for long-term commitments. During one Black Friday sale, I helped a student friend get their Plus plan for nearly 50% off the regular price. Mullvad, true to their straightforward approach, doesn’t offer special discounts or promotions – the price is the price, regardless of who you are or when you subscribe.
Bottom line on pricing and value: If you need a simple, no-nonsense approach with a moderate price point and complete feature access, Mullvad’s flat €5/month rate is hard to beat. If you want tiered options ranging from free to premium, or if you need support for more simultaneous connections, ProtonVPN offers better flexibility. For households or users needing both secure email and VPN services, ProtonVPN’s bundled Visionary plan provides excellent consolidated value.
User Experience and Interface
I still remember fumbling through my first VPN setup, clicking random buttons and hoping for the best! That experience made me appreciate well-designed interfaces. Let me walk you through how ProtonVPN and Mullvad handle the user experience.
ProtonVPN’s desktop application feels polished and intuitive. The first time I launched it, I was greeted by a world map showing server locations – visually engaging and practical. The sidebar categorizes servers by country, with additional filters for P2P and streaming-optimized options. For newcomers to VPNs, these visual cues make finding the right server much easier.
Mullvad takes a more minimalist approach. Their desktop app is straightforward – a list of countries, a connect button, and basic settings. When I first used it, I was initially disappointed by the lack of visual flair, but over time, I’ve come to appreciate its no-nonsense efficiency. Everything I need is readily accessible without distracting graphics.
The mobile experience reveals different priorities. ProtonVPN’s mobile app maintains visual consistency with their desktop version, including the map interface (which works surprisingly well even on smaller screens). One frustrating aspect I encountered was that some advanced features were more difficult to access on mobile compared to desktop.
Mullvad’s mobile app is essentially a stripped-down version of their already minimal desktop interface. While this makes it extremely easy to use, I sometimes miss having access to more detailed information about servers without digging through menus. That said, for quick connections on the go, the simplicity is perfect.
Setup processes differ significantly. ProtonVPN guides users through each step with clear explanations, making it ideal for VPN newcomers. When I helped my not-very-tech-savvy mom set up ProtonVPN on her laptop, she managed it with minimal assistance, which speaks volumes about their user-friendly approach.
Mullvad’s setup is more technical, assuming some basic knowledge of VPN concepts. The first time I installed it, I had to look up what “bridge mode” meant and when I should use it. For tech-comfortable users, this isn’t a problem, but it could intimidate beginners.
Configurability is where personal preferences really matter. ProtonVPN offers plenty of options but organizes them intuitively with explanations for each setting. When I wanted to set up split tunneling to exclude certain apps from the VPN tunnel, the process was straightforward with helpful tooltips guiding me through.
Mullvad offers deep configurability but with less hand-holding. Their advanced settings let you tweak nearly every aspect of your connection, which I’ve grown to appreciate as I’ve become more knowledgeable about VPNs. That said, I definitely wouldn’t recommend diving into these settings without some background knowledge.
Customer support experiences have been revealing. When I encountered an issue with ProtonVPN’s split tunneling on Windows, their support team responded within hours with clear, step-by-step instructions that resolved my problem. Their knowledge base is extensive, with articles covering most common scenarios.
With Mullvad, support responses have been technically excellent but sometimes assume more knowledge than I had when I first started using their service. Their documentation is comprehensive but written more for technically-inclined users. When I had questions about their bridge mode configuration, the response I received solved my problem but included terminology I needed to research.
Special features integration shows different approaches to UX. ProtonVPN’s Secure Core feature is presented with clear explanations of when and why you might want to use it. The first time I enabled it, a helpful popup explained the security benefits and potential speed impact, helping me make an informed decision.
Mullvad integrates their multihop and bridge features more subtly, treating them as standard configuration options rather than highlighted special features. This approach assumes users understand these concepts already – great for experienced VPN users, potentially confusing for newcomers.
Update processes reflect different philosophies. ProtonVPN provides detailed release notes with their updates, explaining new features and fixes in user-friendly language. When they added WireGuard protocol support, they included a simple explanation of the benefits, which I appreciated.
Mullvad’s updates are more technically oriented, often listing changes in developer terminology. While they always explain security improvements thoroughly, feature additions sometimes lack the context that would help average users understand their significance.
The login experience highlights fundamental differences in approach. ProtonVPN uses a traditional username/password system that most users are familiar with. Mullvad’s account number system – while more privacy-focused – took some getting used to. I actually wrote my account number on a piece of paper (probably defeating the privacy purpose!) until I got comfortable with their system.
One particularly frustrating experience with ProtonVPN was when their server load indicators weren’t updating correctly during a period of high traffic. I kept connecting to supposedly “low load” servers that were actually congested. Mullvad doesn’t prominently display load percentages, which initially seemed like a disadvantage but meant I never faced this particular issue with their service.
Bottom line on user experience: ProtonVPN offers a more polished, guided experience that’s ideal for VPN newcomers and users who appreciate visual interfaces. Their applications feel modern and accessible, with intelligent organization of features. Mullvad prioritizes efficiency and minimalism, creating an experience that gets out of your way but might be less intuitive for beginners. Your preference will likely depend on your technical comfort level and whether you value visual guidance or straightforward efficiency.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Whew, what a journey we’ve been on comparing these two privacy powerhouses! After using both ProtonVPN and Mullvad extensively, I’ve developed some clear perspectives on which service might work best for different types of users.
Let’s recap the key strengths and weaknesses. ProtonVPN shines with its tiered pricing structure (including that fantastic free option!), user-friendly apps, and excellent streaming capabilities. Their Secure Core architecture provides an additional privacy layer that privacy-conscious users will appreciate. However, their speed on distant servers sometimes lags behind Mullvad, and their most complete features require the pricier Plus plan.
Mullvad stands out with their unwavering commitment to anonymity (that no-account system is brilliant!), consistently fast speeds even on distant servers, and straightforward pricing. Their minimalist approach focuses
Leave a Reply